Key Differences Between Searchers and Independent Sponsors

Searchers and independent sponsors are two approaches to buying and managing businesses, but they differ significantly in experience, financial risk, and operational roles:

• Searchers: Typically early-career professionals (often MBAs) who raise funds to acquire smaller businesses ($500K-$3M EBITDA). They take full-time CEO roles and personally guarantee loans, often using SBA financing.
• Independent Sponsors: Experienced professionals (e.g., private equity backgrounds) who focus on larger deals ($3M-$10M EBITDA). They raise capital per deal, avoid personal guarantees, and act as strategic advisors rather than operators.

Quick Comparison

Choose searching if you want hands-on operational control and are comfortable with higher financial risk. Opt for independent sponsoring if you prefer strategic oversight, lower risk, and managing multiple investments.

Self-Funded Search vs. Independent Sponsorship

1. What Searchers Do

The searcher model focuses on three main factors: experience level, capital needs, and operational involvement. Searchers are usually early in their careers, often MBA graduates, who aim to become entrepreneurs by acquiring a business.

To start, searchers raise $400,000 to $500,000 to cover operational expenses. They then secure over $1 million in acquisition funding, frequently through SBA loans that finance 75-90% of the purchase price [1][4]. During the 12-24 months they spend searching for the right business, searchers receive an annual living wage of $100,000 to $200,000 [4].

This model is distinct from the independent sponsor approach (which we'll discuss later). Typically, searchers:

• Personally guarantee loans, often relying on SBA financing for most of the acquisition cost [1].
• Target industries like service-based businesses and light manufacturing [3].
• Take on full-time CEO responsibilities [1].

The financial setup combines 30-50% debt financing [4], with searchers generally holding 20-30% ownership of the acquired business [4].

2. What Independent Sponsors Do

Independent sponsors operate differently from searchers, drawing on their backgrounds in investment banking or private equity [2]. Their focus is on businesses with $3M-$10M in EBITDA, aiming to build diversified portfolios while concentrating on strategic oversight. This approach contrasts sharply with the hands-on, CEO-level involvement typical of searchers.

To fund their deals, independent sponsors raise capital on a per-deal basis from private equity firms and high-net-worth individuals. They also utilize bank loans and mezzanine financing [2]. Their earnings come from acquisition fees (2-5%), management fees (around 5% of EBITDA), and profit shares of 20-30% upon exit [1][2].

Unlike searchers who take on full-time operational roles, independent sponsors:

• Serve on boards to offer strategic guidance
• Hire skilled operators to handle daily operations
• Focus on driving growth through strategic initiatives
• Aim to exit investments within 2-5 years [2]

They typically oversee 2-4 companies at once, applying their industry knowledge across multiple investments [2]. Reflecting their limited operational involvement, independent sponsors rarely provide personal guarantees, which sets them apart from searchers who often take on loan obligations [2]. Their strength lies in identifying opportunities, structuring deals, and steering strategic growth, rather than managing day-to-day operations.

sbb-itb-cce425d

Benefits and Drawbacks

When deciding between searchers and independent sponsors, it's important to weigh their key advantages and limitations. Here's a quick comparison of how these two models stack up:

The searcher model appeals to those aiming for hands-on operational experience. Searchers gain complete control of the business and have the potential for higher returns through majority equity ownership [1][2].

But it’s not without challenges. The biggest hurdle is the financial risk - searchers often need to personally guarantee loans, such as SBA loans [1][2]. On top of that, the search process can be lengthy, sometimes taking 1-2 years to find and acquire a business [5].

Independent sponsors, on the other hand, benefit from reduced financial risk and the ability to manage multiple investments at once. This approach allows for diversification and flexibility in deal structuring [2].

However, independent sponsors face their own challenges. They often need to secure funding for each deal, which can be time-consuming, and managing multiple stakeholders adds complexity [1][2]. Additionally, meeting investor return expectations to earn carried interest can create added pressure.

The choice ultimately comes down to your priorities: Are you willing to take on personal financial risk for operational control, or do you prefer a diversified portfolio with less direct involvement? These tradeoffs will help guide your decision, which we'll delve into further in the next section.

Making Your Choice

Choosing between these models involves looking closely at four key factors: how much time you can commit, your financial situation, your experience in the industry, and your overall goals.

Your financial situation and willingness to take on risk are critical. Here's a quick breakdown to help guide your decision:

Your industry experience and professional network are also important. This approach often works well for those with backgrounds in fields like investment banking or private equity [2].

When it comes to time commitment, the two paths are quite different. Being a searcher usually means dedicating yourself full-time to one business, which might even involve moving to a new location. On the other hand, independent sponsors typically work on 2-4 portfolio companies at the same time, offering more flexibility [2].

Independent sponsors also have the advantage of geographic flexibility, unlike searchers who often need to relocate [1].

Before making a decision, take a hard look at your operational experience, access to capital, and how much risk you're willing to take.

FAQs

Here are answers to some common questions about these models, highlighting their main differences:

What is the difference between a search fund and an independent sponsor?

A search fund involves raising money upfront to buy and manage a single company, with the searcher taking on the role of a full-time CEO. On the other hand, an independent sponsor raises funds for each deal individually and often takes on an advisory or oversight role instead of running the business directly.

Here’s a quick breakdown of their key traits: